Jump to content
Butcher_Bird

Новый H.O.T.A.S от Winwing в стиле F-18.

Recommended Posts

 

https://winwing.cn/en/JOYSTICK

F/A-18 H.O.T.A.S★ SUPER LIBRA JOYSTICK BASE★ SUPER TAURUS THROTTLE BASE★ F/A-18C FLIGHT OPS PANEL★ F/A-18C JOYSTICK GRIP★ F/A-18C THROTTLE HANDLE★ JOYSTICK DESK MOUNT Free for Pre-Order Custormer!★ THROTTLE DESK MOUNT Free for Pre-Order Custormer!
$799.95USD

 

 

Edited by Butcher_Bird
  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Китайцы вышли на новый уровень.Ручка метал?

Edited by Antony99

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

спросил у них в почту чисто за руд, но нет, говорят, отдельно планов нет продавать 🤔

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Кстати, смотрел видео за механику рус и её разработку, там в итоге от кулачков с мягким центром решили отказаться. И я вот смотрел другое видео с демонстрацией работы, прям видно эту ступеньку и переход через центр, визуально.  Странным мне кажется такое решение. Самолёт практически никогда не летит ровно при центральном положении ручки, то ветер на него действует, то моменты вращения винтов, то закрыли и тд. Даже если триммировать постоянно... И вот смысл в этом физически чётко центре, я больше негатива в этом вижу. И ещё, что пользователю с того, что вес на пару сотен грамм удалось уменьшить? При общем весе комплекта это смешно... Ну может они разными кулачками комплектуют, тогда норм

 А так, играть в DCS  на Ф-18 круто, наверное) 

Edited by =BULAT=PAPasha

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Уже есть достаточно информации чтобы понять что это за продукция. Если проводку китайцы на термо клей посадили и думают что этим пофиксили то как они будут фиксить механизм РУДа? Если честно даже не интересно. 

A1F1A048-E433-4B65-AFCC-36DAC7B29BBA.jpeg

A595310C-C3D4-4850-AED6-36DBF7BD03E9.jpeg

628937447_image0(1).thumb.jpg.0ad29d23eda7571e3461dd46939e25d2.jpgimage0.thumb.jpg.5d218709a4755ce74e06656ed028f52e.jpgUntitled.thumb.jpg.4b7a6b3dccb6b27042ad99837e7fb778.jpgUntitled1.thumb.jpg.a13a2cc9b4da082ea7873866c6540c12.jpgUntitled2.thumb.jpg.d0cc58a46d04fb5fcff7f79bbae1f937.jpg

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Цитата

Hey everyone, I wanted to give an update on the WINWING HOTAS review I was working on. As of yesterday I sent an email to WINWING explaining that I am no longer going to do the review. The HOTAS I have is no longer the HOTAS any customer will receive. The fact of the matter is that WINWING sent me what they are claiming now to be an Engineering Sample. From looking back at prior announcements and conversations, WINWING originally sent the reviewers what they at the time were considering a production read unit. The same unit that would have gone to customers. However, we (the reviewers) found a long list of issues both with the hardware and software on these units. WINWING worked diligently to try and fix all the issues and send out notices to us that they had been addressed. In a couple cases they shipped us parts (springs and cams) and in at least 1 case (my own) they sent me a 2nd stick base due to an issue when trying to adjust the Center Stop Device on the original base they gave me. With all of these issues and fixes however, WINWING is now claiming that we now have "Engineering Samples" and not the production units. Now, is this true? I guess it is NOW, but this was not the original intention... However I get it, things changed, and hopefully for the better for their customers. The issue however is that I now have a piece of hardware to review with that still has issues, but doesn't actually reflect the final product. So, because of this I've come to the conclusion that doing a review would not only waste my time, but the viewers as well. Why watch a review on something that technically isn't real, or isn't what you would be getting if you order the product? Not only that, but based on all the problems there is no way I can make a review that sheds any kind of positive light on the product itself, aside from maybe its potential. I do not feel that this would be fair to WINWING, myself or any of my viewers, so, there will not be a review. This post is in no way intended to show as a bad mark on WINWING's part. I do think they have potential. I do think they are a very customer oriented company. I do think they want to make a good product and have enough passion and ambition to do so. But, I also think they may have jumped the gun a bit, maybe rushed to market and shouldn't have given the reviewers the responsibility to be their testers. In the time I've been playing DCS, I've seen about 4 hardware companies come up from nothing and I've seen pretty much each of them go through teething issues similar to WINWING. Hopefully that's all this is, they learn from their mistakes, learn what works and what doesn't and ultimately it helps make their company better from it. I've offered to return all products sent to me by WINWING and thanked them for the opportunity to help them test and provide feedback as I did. I regret that I cannot do the review, especially after all the time I put into it already, but I think this decision is better for everyone involved, I just also felt it should be transparent to you guys as well.

 

От одного из западных обзорщиков ДКС

 

Цитата

Если коротко, то ему прислали железки на обзор, с ними были проблемы, им прислали замену, с ними тоже были вопросы, да и назвали они это "инженерными образцами" вместо "конечного продукта". В итоге, Jabbers решил, что нет смысла делать обзор незаконченного продукта, чтобы не тратить ни свое время, ни время зрителей.

 

 

 

Edited by FlankerD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...